Friday, 15 November 2019

Lupine Publishers | Smoke and Incendiary Weapons

Lupine Publishers | LOJ Pharmacology & Clinical Research

 

Abstract
The incendiary weapons were among the first that were used beside the considered personal weapons: clubs, stones, stone knives. When the human being began to dominate the fire, he managed to develop ways to use it for his benefit, both in peaceful actions (such as changing food by roasting or cooking the clay to produce pots, figurines and adobe for construction) and in other types of aggressive applications, developing methods to burn the possessions of the enemies. Of course, fire management also allowed the knowledge of the smoke, which was then used for at least two purposes: taking advantage of its toxic properties to dislodge strategic positions (or force the animals sheltered in caves to go out and be at the mercy of the hunters) or to raise screens that hid some aggressive movements to indiscreet eyes. It has been said that the first incendiary agent used for war purposes was the so-called “Greek fire”, which was applied from the seventh century until the end of the Middle Ages. Its importance was supreme for the Byzantine Empire, helping to repel the attacks directed against Constantinople by the Arabs and the Russians between the years 671 to 678 of our era, but it was also of vital importance to repel attacks of the crusaders in the XII century. Although it is considered the direct predecessor of NAPALM, it may not be real that it was the first weapon of this class.
Introduction
The interpretation of some Assyrian reliefs shows that in the ninth century BC. incendiaries were used, especially during settlement sieges; torches, lighted resins and lighted oil pots were thrown at the aggressor troops. Herodotus mentions that the Persians used arrows whose tip was smeared with pitch lit during the capture of Athens, around 480 BC. The Peloponnesian War records the use of incendiary weapons against wooden walls in 429 a. C. The catapult made it possible to throw burning materials against specific targets at the sieges of Syracuse (413 BC) and Rhodes (304 BC). By that time (Alexander the Great already dead) they began to develop the incendiary missiles and the mixtures difficult to control. For example, Aeneas mentions (360 BC) that pine needles, sulfur, pitch and resin or incense were used, which produced a fire that was not quenched with water but with vinegar. History is full of events and battles fought in the midst of fire. The incendiary mixtures were improving as the scientific knowledge was increasing on time. The discovery of oil generated new possibilities in these aspects, because it allowed to defend stone walls by setting them on fire with materials that adhered to any solid. It is said that Alexander the Great once found a lake of naphtha that flared up as soon as a flame approached it. The material of the lake was distributed along a whole street and when a flame approached one end, immediately the fire spread to the opposite side. To extinguish such fires, it was necessary to use enormous quantities of water or soil, mud, vinegar or alum, among other materials. It should be noted that the current vinegar is not much more effective than plain water, but it is believed that in the classification of vinegar made by ancient authors such as Plutarco, mixtures and sauces made with vinegar and salt were included; in fact, Pliny mentions that the Gauls and the Germans extinguished the ignited wood using salt water from the sea. During the colonization of North America, American Indians used lighted arrows to set fire to the facilities of white pioneers. In Europe, the men of King Charles of Sweden, in 1701, burned straw to produce a smoke screen covering the activities of the aforementioned army, mainly when crossing the Dvina River. An incendiary agent is a chemical or a mixture of chemicals that produces a combustion reaction and releases a large amount of heat continuously. The oxygen necessary to maintain combustion can be obtained from the atmosphere or it can be part of the incendiary agent, which gives characteristics of autonomy to the corresponding weapon. The heat of combustion of an incendiary agent must be high enough to ignite or damage the selected target, with a speed that does not allow rapid dissipation and, at the same time, facilitates the transfer of heat between the agent and the target.
The primary purpose of incendiary weapons is to cause damage to the enemy in their persons and property, mainly by means of heat or direct flame. It may be the case that weapons of high explosive power cause heat waves and even fires, but because the predominant effects and the intention of their use are focused on the explosive and fragmentation effects, we will not address their use and characteristics. Some incendiary agents are poisons “per se”, while some others produce toxic or asphyxiating effects when burning. The incendiary agents can be of an intensive or dispersive type; the intensive ones are destined to materials and constructions that are not very combustible, for which it is required that their combustion temperature is very high and that their flames form a compact mass. Within this type of agents we have the metallic ones (based on reactive metals) and the pyrotechnic ones (they contain their own source of oxygen). On the other hand, the dispersive agents are destined for easily combustible objectives or for living beings; these objectives do not require great intensity of fire and heat as the dispersion in large areas of small quantities of the incendiary in combustion is sufficient to cause damage. Here pyrophoric (substances that ignite spontaneously on contact with air) and those made with oils (such as Napalm) are highlighted, increasing their destructive power according to their adhesiveness, that is, their ability to stick to surfaces during the combustion, for which additives have been devised that improve their adhesive properties. Molotov street bombs (gasoline and oil in a fragile bottle with a rag on the mouth) are dispersive arsonists, which increase their adhesiveness if they are added sugar, for example. The sugar with the temperature begins to caramelize, sticking to the surfaces and takes some time to burn completely.
The incendiary weapons systems are composed of three main parts: the incendiary agent itself; ammunition to discharge and ignite the incendiary agent in the desired area, and a propulsion system that allows the ammunition to reach the established target. Current technology systems allow incendiary weapons to be launched by aircraft, artillery pieces, combat vehicles and even infantrymen.
For a Better Understanding of This Type of Weapons, We Can Classify Them As Follows:
Metal Incendiaries
This type of agent is made up of metals that react easily with atmospheric oxygen. The best known and most used is magnesium, not so much for its price as for its accessibility and its high reactivity. Very generally, to increase its performance as an incendiary, it is used in alloys, the best known being the so-called Elektron, which contains aluminum and small amounts of copper. It is also possible to heat it and react it with water, which generates hydrogen, which burns or explodes, making it difficult to control the fire. One way to further complicate the control of this kind of fires, is adding 20% of cadmium to an incendiary alloy, generating, as a combustion product, a gas that is twice as poisonous as hydrogen cyanide. In small bombs, whose weight ranges between 50 and 250 kg, it is very used against buildings of brick, stone, cement or metal, because the bombs have the capacity to penetrate across the roofs and explode inside the buildings, causing the inflammation of the goods contained in the targets. Looking for greater effectiveness, they are usually thrown in bunches of at least 100 units. Another metal used as an incendiary agent is zirconium, which has an additional property to those of magnesium: it produces sparks when hitting hard surfaces. Uranium is also a pyrophoric agent, which can be obtained for these purposes from the preparation of enriched uranium to be used as a nuclear fuel; Non-radioactive uranium is then used as an incendiary, for example, in aerial darts.

Pyrotechnique Incendiaries
This class of agents has the characteristic of containing its own source of oxygen, in such a way that an impoverished atmosphere does not hinder its combustion. The main agent of this classification, the termite, mixes aluminum powder and iron oxides. It is lit by a wick and burns with greater violence than magnesium and at a higher temperature; during combustion molten metallic iron is released, which contributes to the propagation of heat. It is worth mentioning that the termite was the most used incendiary agent during the First World War, and it still remains in use to this day.
The termite is usually modified to improve its characteristics, by adding some materials. Such is the case of thermate, which consists of thermite added with metallic aluminum, sulfur and barium nitrate. Other kinds of termatos include, in addition, carbonaceous materials that increase the total generation of heat. The thermats are widely used in hand grenades and aviation bombs whose use corresponds to that described for magnesium bombs.

Pyrophoric Incendiaries
These are materials that ignite spontaneously when they come in contact with the air. In dry air the beginning of the reaction it is difficult or delayed a little; for these specific cases a special wick is used. White phosphorus belongs to this classification, which is very common for burning very combustible materials. When it contacts the air, it explodes into flames and, due to the humidity, produces dense clouds of smoke. This last property causes it to be used, in addition to being an arsonist, to make signals or to spread smoke screens. Coupled with the above, it turns out that, once in flames, white phosphorus adheres strongly to surfaces and is extremely difficult to extinguish with water (and if it goes out, it self-ignites again once dry). All these properties make it difficult to control the fires started by this agent. To increase its efficiency, it is common to use plasticizers and flammable substances of high combustion temperature. A typical mixture of the latter class is composed of finely divided white phosphorus, suspended in a rubber and xylene gel. It is commonly used in aviation rockets, supporting ground operations. A single launcher can fire six rockets with a minimum caliber of 70 mm, and several of these rocket launchers can be attached to an aircraft. Another important pyrophoric is triethylaluminum, a liquid that burns on contact with air or water, sometimes with explosive violence. Polyisobutylene can be used as a thickening agent, which produces a plastic that is capable of causing severe epithelial burns and which is very difficult to extinguish. This is used in rockets that are fired from portable launchers. The most common rockets of this type, are projectiles of 66 mm of caliber that are fired with a launcher of four tubes resting on the shoulder; they have a weight of 1.5 kg, a range that varies from 200 m (with millimeter accuracy) to 750 m (with less accuracy) and a payload of 0.6 kg of thickened triethylaluminum. Upon impact, this load is spread over a radius of approximately 20 m.

Oil Based Incendiaries
Petroleum-derived hydrocarbons are an excellent raw material for incendiary agents: they are abundant, have a high heat of combustion and generate appreciable amounts of carbon monoxide, among other properties. However, those whose volatility allows them to light easily, such as gasoline, burn too quickly, so when thrown away they are consumed in a large flamboyant but ineffective flash. For this reason, gasoline is mixed with thickeners that help to significantly increase its destructive power: they make it more suitable for warlike uses depending on the modifications to its flow properties; their cohesiveness and adhesion properties are also altered in such a way that they adhere to the surfaces, the burning time is prolonged and the combustion temperature is increased. The most common additive was rubber, towards the beginning of the Second World War; however, rubber became a strategic raw material for the manufacture of tires, so it was imperative to find a substitute. The isobutyl polymethacrylate and the polymethyl methacrylate began to be used; shortly after it was seen that certain soaps were more advantageous than polymers (soaps are metal salts of fatty acids).
In 1942 it was discovered that an aluminum soap obtained from coconut acid, naphthenic acid and oleic acid, is a thickener of special qualities. This soap was given the name of Napalm (contraction of the words NAphtenate and PALMitate), a term that has been generalized to designate, in addition to the soap that gives rise to, all the types of thickened hydrocarbons that are used as incendiary agents. This soap easily absorbs moisture from the air and can be mixed with gasoline to obtain a gelatin that varies in its consistency, depending on the amount of soap used, from a very fluid liquid to an almost solid jelly. For portable flamethrowers, for example, a mixture of 30 liters of gasoline thickened with 1 kg of soap is used. For use in incendiary bombs, larger quantities of napalm soap are required to ensure that the fragments that emerge from the explosion that disperses them are not less than 100 g in weight. They are employed profusely in the so-called tactical incendiary bombs, for the support of terrestrial activities, either against military installations and vehicles or against population centers. These bombs consist of a thin walled container loaded with napalm (one of the most used versions is 400 liters capacity). When impacting the ground, the bomb disperses its content on an elliptical surface of approximately 120 m in length by 25 m in width; in this model the napalm is lit by a load of less than 1 kg of white phosphorus, which produces a huge fireball that slows down by just 5 seconds, but leaves the napalm burning for at least 5 minutes more. Since the described container takes the form of an auxiliary fuel tank, a single airplane can carry several of these bombs under the wings.
You can also use napalm in flamethrowers (which from the invention of napalm acquired a special tactical importance), of which there are two main types: the portable and the mechanical. The first, to be transported by a soldier in the back, consists of a napalm tank, another one of compressed air (or any other propellant) and a nozzle with a lighter. The most used model weighs about 25 kg, has capacity for 15 liters of napalm, a range of 50 m and a minimum duration of 8 seconds when it is fired in a single burst; of course, you can also shoot in shorter bursts. The mechanical flamethrower can be used as a main or auxiliary weapon mounted on a combat vehicle. Its capacity is usually 1,300 liters, its range is 200 m and its minimum duration is one minute.
The most recent investigations about this type of agents indicate that the possibility of adding napalm pyrophoric substances that assure re-ignition once it has been turned off is studied, as well as adding special compounds called metallic carbonyls to its formulation that increase its toxic action in closed spaces, simultaneously generating carbon monoxide and poisonous metallic aerosols.

Employment of Fire Agents
Basically, the use of incendiary weapons is directed towards military targets to immobilize transports; for the destruction of strategically important facilities; for the destruction of centers of food supply or of fields of culture, cattle raising, etc .; obviously to kill and, finally, even when these are not the only uses, to bring down the morale of a people at war. The instinctive fear of fire dates from its discovery by the man of the caverns. Therefore, the psychological effect of the use of incendiary weapons can be more devastating than the weapons themselves, because of the consequences generated by a wave of generalized panic that hinders and even makes impossible the survival and control procedures that could be applied. The fact that incendiary weapons are artifacts whose effects go beyond any humanitarian consideration in acts of war, led to the signature in 1980 of the Protocol on prohibitions or restrictions on the use of incendiary weapons, within the framework of the holding of the United Nations Conference on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or of Indiscriminate Effects, which took place from September 15 to October 10, 1980. It should be noted that publication by The UN report on napalm and other incendiary weapons was followed very large efforts to regulate such weapons. It is argued that certain incendiary weapons can have a very high specific military value, but it is also true that the wounds caused by them are appalling and extremely painful, difficult to deal with and often lead to death or permanent deformations and incapacities, without counting the serious psychological traumas that leave as a sequel in the victims. The aforementioned report concludes that the use of these weapons must be considered to cause unnecessary suffering. Therefore, there is a tendency towards a complete and absolute prohibition rather than a limited prohibition, which lends itself more to violation than to compliance with the norm. This has happened in different parts of the world: Iraq, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Syria, etc. It has come to the cynical extreme to say that bombs with white phosphorus are used not as incendiary weapons but as a method of night lighting! If this type of weapon is totally and absolutely banned, the road for its control and destruction is facilitated, that is, the road to disarmament is cleared and paving stones are laid to pave the avenue of peace. Hopefully we can see it soon, for the good of all humanity.




 

For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishersgroup.com/

For more Psychology And Behavioral Sciences articles Please Click
Here: https://lupinepublishers.com/pharmacology-clinical-research-journal/

To Know more Open Access Publishers Click on Lupine Publishers


Follow on Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/company/lupinepublishers
Follow on Twitter   :  https://twitter.com/lupine_online

 

Wednesday, 13 November 2019

Friday, 8 November 2019

Lupine Publishers: Lupine Publishers | The Study of Parameters and Re...

Lupine Publishers: Lupine Publishers | The Study of Parameters and Re...: Lupine Publishers- Environmental and Soil Science Journal Introduction In recent years, both in the Republic and in the...

Lupine Publishers | Pharmacology & Clinical Research


Lupine Publishers | Of Syringes, Vaccines and Chemistry

Abstract
The modern trend to avoid vaccination is based mainly on superstición and bad science understanding and includes a bad medical practice. In this article we talk about how vaccines were originated, if the syringe development and the importance of materials chemistry to improve its manufacture.
Keywords: Vaccine; Syringe; Immunization; Jenner; Wood
The Beginnings of Immunization
Since its appearance on the face of the planet, the human being has been accompanied by diseases that cause infections and that are easily transmitted from person to person. This is logical if we think that the first living beings were the unicellular ones; thus, it is not surprising that epidemics were already mentioned before our era and, in addition, possible ways of surviving the infection. It is possible that in India, 1,500 B. C., epidemics and forms of a very early vaccination were documented. It is mentioned that the Egyptians sought some form of inoculation with microorganisms, while Thucydides refers to some plague saying: “... this disease is not suffered twice and if it were to suffer again, it would not be with deadly results ...”, which leads to think that non-fatal infected people were immunized, similar to what happens with vaccines. From shortly before the beginning of the Christian era and until the twelfth century, the Chinese used to dry the pustules of both humans and cows infected with smallpox. Once dry, they sprayed them and made people, especially those who had daily contact with cattle, inhale the dust through their noses to try to get immunized, which was achieved in a huge number of cases. This technique was called scarification. Another practice that was developed in the search for control of these pests was the use of material infected with smallpox among humans: food was prepared, for example, and the sickest person was the first one to eat it, to later pass it in the same recipient among all the members of the family or community [1].
Many of these customs persisted in the Middle East and were introduced in Europe mainly by the Ottoman invasions; but in the eighteenth century the wife of the English ambassador in Turkey (who had applied the technique to her own six-year-old son) proposed the use of scarification to deal with the smallpox epidemic that struck London in 1721. Applied experimentally about some inmates and in view of the positive results, the princesses Amelia and Carolina, daughters of the Prince of Wales and future King George II were subjected to this treatment; they suffered the disease very slightly and had no sequelae or the horrible marks left on the faces of the survivors. The scarification gained ground until Edward Jenner, an English physician, developed a different and properly protocolized method. A milkmaid who had lesions with pus on her hands (presumably cowpox), named Sarah Nelmes, allowed Jenner to take that pus and with it she inoculated a child, James Phipps. The inoculation was usually done with a metal lancet that was put in contact with the infected material, to then produce pickets or small cuts in the skin of the people to whom it was wished to infect. We must emphasize that before experimenting with the child Phipps, Jenner had inoculated his own son of 18 months of age. Six weeks after this inoculation James was inoculated again, now with pus from active lesions of human pox. The child Phipps did not get infected and Jenner waited a month to try again to infect him with human smallpox. Excited by this success, Jenner repeated the experiment with 32 more people, achieving the immunity of all of them [2]. Despite all the setbacks that occurred, Jenner went ahead and in 1803 the entire royal family was vaccinated with his technique, which began to be used in Europe and then around the world. Perhaps the memory that George Washington was a survivor of smallpox, led to the acceptance of the method in the United States. It is said that the first Russian child vaccinated was called Vaccinov (because of the vaccine). On the other hand, Napoleón I in 1812 decreed obligatory the vaccination against the smallpox in the army and tried to take it to all the French society [3].
The Beginning of the Injection
Ovid tells that Medea helped Jason get the golden fleece in exchange for his promise of marriage. Medea was a powerful priestess and sorceress who returned youth to Jason’s father, Esón, cutting his throat and then filling his body with a magic potion. He did this with a double purpose: to get well with Jason and demonstrate his power. There are many researchers who assume that the act performed by Medea to rejuvenate Esón was simply a blood transfusion. We would be talking about introducing a foreign substance to the body, more than two thousand years ago. The next historical reference to a blood transfusion is available until the fifteenth century, when blood was taken from three young men -who died for it- for a Jewish doctor to carry out a transfusion to Pope Innocent VIII. However, we do not know anything about the way in which these transfusions were carried out. In the midseventeenth century Christofer Wren, assisted among others by Robert Boyle (the alchemist and scientist who enunciated Boyle’s law for gases, among other principles) administered intravenous drugs to patients. A cut was made in the vein, a silver or gold tube was inserted, and the liquid was introduced by pumping it through a leather bladder (like an enema, an enema) or by simple gravity. The medications used were water, opium or purgatives; many of these procedures were aimed at treating syphilis. Towards the nineteenth century an instrument was developed that allowed to pump liquids in small quantities with greater comfort; these were hand-held devices (not as large as enema bladders), which fit in one hand. They consisted of a hollow tube in which a plunger was inserted to push the contents of the tube towards the end; This was also hollow and was introduced in various parts of the body for the administration of substances [4,5].
The wife of the Scottish scientist Alexander Wood suffered from very intense neuralgia and that motivated Word to find a way to alleviate his pain more quickly and effectively. To make the opium action faster and more effective, Wood used some device designs that allowed him to “push” a drug through a kind of pump and managed to improve this design (simultaneously with the work of the French Charles Gabriel Pravaz) by using a needle with a hollow body and tip; with this the medicine could be introduced in the skin of the patient, looking for the rapidity in the administration. Wood argued that, at least in the case of analgesics such as morphine (opium), it should be deposited in a nerve very close to the site in which the pain was located. He published an article about these studies entitled A new method to treat neuralgia through the direct application of opioids in pain points. A legend says that Wood’s excitement at experimenting on how to cure pain caused him to administer too many injections in a short time, until his wife died, but without pain. This has not been proven historically, but it is still a curious detail, not forgetting the fact that what Wood’s wife really had was a kind of arthritis. Another form of this legend says that it was about migraines, but the article written by Wood is quite clear and points out the application in painful joints. The important thing of this matter is that a way of depositing the opiates was found in such a way that if they caused side effects on the digestive system (esophagus, stomach or intestines), they no longer appeared. Obviously, the first deduction was that if they were deposited near the affected sites, the opioids would work better. For five years this was applied by those doctors who believed in this novel technique, until Dr. Charles Hunter was presented with a complication: two of his patients developed local abscesses precisely at the sites where they received injections. This caused Hunter to experiment to see if the same response could be obtained by depositing the analgesics away from the directly affected sites and the results were positive. Hunter coined the term hypodermic (under the skin) but had to face a demand established by Wood accusing him of plagiarism and malpractice. The medical journals became battlefields until a committee of the Surgical Medical Society of London was formed, which two years later ruled in favor of Hunter: the new technique would be called hypodermic and it was concluded that it was possible that the injection of opiates will be successfully managed away from the site of pain. The most curious of all this is that no one, neither the doctors involved with Wood nor those who were in favor of Hunter, nor the Medical Society itself thought about the problems that were causing the patients: tolerance, addiction and over demand, among others, for how lucrative it was to have so many patients and so much opium to administer. Be that as it may, the hollow needle and the hypodermic syringe, the predecessor of the one we use today to administer medicines and vaccines or to draw blood, for example, were invented and perfected. Or to fill ink cartridges for printer.
Materials of Construction of Syringes
Initially the plunger or piston of the syringes had cotton on the tip so that there was a good fit between the body of the syringe and the piston, which allowed the liquid to be driven. The end of the syringe was conical in shape and the hollow needle was adapted at the end. It was initially worked with metals but soon changed to glass, because of its quality of not reacting with the substances that were injected. For example, morphine is obtained from opium using hydrochloric acid and consequently the liquid that was injected to the patients had acidic characteristics, which could react with the metal. To not break the glass easily and give greater security to those who used these syringes, the body of these was inserted into a metal support spice that allowed rapid handling while showing the amount of substance that was injected. The twentieth century brought several changes in the design and construction of syringes. The common glass is known as alkaline glass and, over time, becomes opaque by washing and contact with water and other materials. To eliminate this problem, we began to use alkali-free glass (Pyrex type); later, a stainless-steel tip attached to the glass, which allowed to secure the needle so that it would not slip and accidentally separate when applying the injection was designed. Thus, the syringes came in stainless steel cases that were also used to sterilize the syringe boiling water in the case itself, which closed hermetically to maintain the sterility of the instrument. The Second World War allowed the development of an auto injection device that would allow the soldiers to inject analgesics or specific antidotes while they were attended by doctors. The innovation was that the needle remained hidden from view by the user, reducing the anxiety that causes most people to know that they are going to inject it. The syringe consisted of a tube filled with the specific medication to be used and a spring that, when hit against a member of the soldier, pushed the needle towards the site of the blow, causing it to penetrate under the skin and release its contents. Towards the middle of the century, the first fully disposable glass syringes were produced with two different purposes and designs: one to collect blood in donation campaigns and the other for polio vaccination campaigns. Meanwhile the steel for the needles and the specific cut for each application were perfected: it was no longer just a question of perforating the skin, but the angle determined whether it was a subcutaneous, intramuscular or intravenous injection. They also worked on finding a way to make disposable needles. The 1960’s decade not only brought the Beatles to the world; they also brought the completely disposable syringes made of plastic and that were marketed in previously sterilized packages.
Encounter between Hypodermal Syringes and Vaccines
From the development of the hypodermic syringe and the hollow needle, the application of the vaccines could be carried out more efficiently, measuring the quantities that were introduced to the body with greater precision. Pasteur’s experiment to find a vaccine against anthrax in cattle is famous, but in the field of human vaccines it is also at least remarkably successful. In 5, without being a doctor and therefore not authorized to give any treatment to any person, Pasteur decided to use the vaccine against rabies developed by his colleague Emile Roux drying the spinal cord of rabbits infected with the disease to treat the child Joseph Meister, who had been attacked by a rabid dog. The child did not develop the disease and Pasteur remained a hero, although if the vaccine had failed, he might have been condemned for his audacity. The important part is that this vaccine was not inoculated but injected. From then on, most vaccines are applied by injection, although many are already ingested.
Vaccine Production
There are several different types of vaccines, depending on how the antigens are produced, that is, the microorganisms or chemicals responsible for unleashing the body’s immune response. Let’s see them quickly.
Living Attenuated Microorganisms
They consist of using the weakened (attenuated) microorganism, which is the closest thing to a real infection. The advantage is that it is the infectious agent itself that provides the immunity; The disadvantages are the need for refrigeration and the possibility of mutations, among others. This form of vaccine is very suitable for the case of viruses. The vaccines against rubella, varicella and some types of influenza, among others, correspond to this kind of preparation.
Inactivated Microorganisms
Dead microorganisms are used; This procedure is better for bacteria. In the case of using this type of vaccines, we have the disadvantage that, as the bodys immune response is slower and slower, it requires the use of reinforcements, that is, new applications of the vaccine. Among the advantages of this kind of vaccine are its stability and its ease of transport and storage, since they do not require refrigeration. Some of the vaccines in this class are rabies, hepatitis A, some types of influenza and polio.
Vaccines in Subunits (Parts of Viruses)
Instead of using the entire microorganism, only the parts that the antibodies recognize to affect their immunizing action are used. This technique greatly reduces the possibility of adverse side reactions occurring in vaccinated persons. Usually cultures of the microorganism are prepared to then use chemical techniques to separate the specific part that leads to obtain the vaccine. Genetic engineering techniques such as recombinant DNA technology can also be used to produce this vaccine. This is how some vaccines against hepatitis B and human papillomavirus are prepared and research is under way to reach the hepatitis C vaccine. They have the advantage that they target a part of the microorganism specifically, and that there are less chances of adverse reactions, but in counterpart its development is more difficult and takes more time.
Toxoids
When a microorganism secretes a toxin (toxic chemical compound in extremely low doses) that causes the disease, the microorganism is cultured to obtain appreciable amounts of the toxin. The microorganism is separated, the toxin is purified and rendered inactive, usually by using a solution of formaldehyde in sterilized water. These detoxified toxins are used as vaccines; When the human body receives this chemical compound deactivated, it learns to fight it and prepares itself for an eventual confrontation with the original toxin. Examples of this class of vaccine are diphtheria and tetanus. Vaccines also contain other chemical compounds as ingredients to make them safer and more effective. Among the most important we have the following.
Preservatives
Prevent the contamination of containers, bottles or culture media with pathogenic germs that could cause other diseases than those prevented by the vaccine. One of the most used preservatives in the past was the so-called thimerosal, a compound that contains mercury. Its use was restricted to the production steps and was eliminated when the vaccine was packaged for storage and transport. Currently, most of the vaccines have been eliminated, but they are still used in some processes, such as some influenza vaccines.
Additives
They help the vaccine retain its potency during storage time; Among other chemical substances used for this purpose, we have gelatin, albumin, sucrose and lactose.
Adjuvants
They help the body to have a better immune response and are usually aluminum salts. These salts help the antigens remain in the injection site and then be transported directly to the lymph nodes, which is where the immune response to the presence of the aggressors begins.
Antibiotics
Sometimes antibiotics can be used to prevent contamination of vaccines. In very isolated cases traces of antibiotics present in vaccines can trigger allergic reactions in vaccinated subjects. Some vaccines are produced in chicken eggs, so that some proteins from the same egg may be present in the vaccine and cause allergic reactions; vaccines against influenza and against yellow fever are produced in this way. Each vaccine requires very specific and controlled conditions for its production: the mixtures of compounds that will serve to cultivate the microorganism, those of the substances that will allow its isolation and conservation; in short, without the achievements of chemistry, we would not have the spectacular advances that allow a huge number of diseases that were deadly a few decades ago can now be prevented. As we can see, chemistry has provided materials so that we can prevent or cure diseases, making our life longer and more pleasant.

https://lupinepublishers.com/pharmacology-clinical-research-journalpdf/LOJPCR.MS.ID.000114.pdf

For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishersgroup.com/

For more Pharmacology And clinical research articles Please Click
Here:https://lupinepublishers.com/pharmacology-clinical-research-journal/

Follow on Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/company/lupinepublishers
Follow on Blogger : https://lupinepublishers.blogspot.com/

 


Monday, 4 November 2019

Lupine Publishers: Lupine Publishers | Dyes and Dyeing

Lupine Publishers: Lupine Publishers | Dyes and Dyeing: Lupine Publishers | Journal of Textile and Fashion Designing Abstract Dyeing in ancient times was conducted from natural animal and...